in 1964 as part of a novel surgical reconstruction for Peyronie’s disease ( 1). The first penile implant was introduced by Lash et al. Keywords: Penile implant complications infection hematoma device malfunction Additional prospective studies with consistent reporting of outcomes and comparison of surgical approach and prosthesis type in patients with variable ED etiology would be beneficial. Meticulous hemostasis and intraoperative testing of devices may further reduce need for revision surgery. Novel antibiotic coatings and standard antibiotic regimen may reduce infection rates. The most common post-operative complications of infection, bleeding, and device malfunction may be minimized by adherence to consistent technique and standard protocol. Etiology for ED, surgical technique, and prosthesis type are variable among studies. This review article focuses on the identification and management of post-operative complications following penile prosthetic and implant surgery. Device survival and complication rates have been investigated predominately by retrospective database-derived studies. Since the 1970s, modifications to these devices have reduced complication rates through improvement in antisepsis and design using antibiotic coatings, kink-resistant tubing, lock-out valves to prevent autoinflation, and modified reservoir shapes. Complications encountered post-operatively include infection, bleeding/hematoma, and device malfunction. Interviews with Outstanding Guest EditorsĪbstract: Penile prosthesis implant surgery is an effective management approach for a number of urological conditions, including medication refractory erectile dysfunction (ED).Policy of Dealing with Allegations of Research Misconduct. Policy of Screening for Plagiarism Process.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |